Someone posted a comment recently stating Dept of State or Sec of State returned letters stating his status and the man was exasperated on what to do next. Well, me assumes the man is already a state national and does not need Dept of State, his servant, to confirm this. He did make an effort to correct the record, by sending a letter (hopefully autographed under penalty of perjury), and if they want to return it, so be it. He’s still a state national.
What matters is how one conducts one’s life. Any state national simply (or not so simply) needs to live life as a mankind and not as the corporate person created with the 2nd birth certificate.
- A state national does not need a license to use (not operate or drive) an auto mobile (not motor vehicle) if the state national got back the MCO, which shows who owns it.
- A state national can claw back allodial title to land and no longer be exposed to property tax (property is technically not land).
- A state would not vote in their ‘national’ elections which is either for United States (meaning the territories) or United States, meaning the corporation.
- A state national can work and the proceeds are not ‘taxable income’, but instead is non-taxable income. But does he feel comfortable stating or claiming he is not a citizen or resident of the United States (he’s not).
- A state national cannot be ‘drafted’ (like a bank transaction).
- A state national does not need to send his/her sons and daughters to attend/work at their school-work institutions with someone who is ‘principal’ of the company. A state national would have the COLB for his sons and daughters.
One must correct historical inaccuracies by claiming and proving one is a state national (get the COLB). Then one must live as a state national and should one of the municipal corporations (created by governments) come knocking, one must state one’s status and ask them to prove they have jurisdiction. If they are trying to stop thee or tax thee, ask them where, pray tell, did they get the right to do this? They may have jurisdiction over their person (created by the 2nd birth certificate) but thou is doing whatever it is as a man or woman, not as a corporate person. Ok, so let them prove they have jurisdiction over the man or woman. They don’t and they can’t.
Most people hang themselves by saying they are a citizen or a U.S. citizen or a resident, or defendant, or driver, or operator, etc. The 1040 form is how people make themselves liable. The federation government puts 1040 forms everywhere (or they did before the electronic versions) so, like the mouse that takes the cheese, people would mistakenly characterize their non-taxable income as taxable income. And this can happen even if Dept of State or Sec of State acknowledges a letter stating one is a state national.
They have deployed many traps for state nationals. Send the letter to Dept of State. Let them send it back. No matter. The lion was brave. The tinman had a heart. And the scarecrow had a brain. They didn’t need Oz to confirm this.
Here’s the comment that inspired this post:
Hello, I’ve been racking my brains & scouring many sources for the end-all answer to how I get to State national status and standing in which I have tried to apply several remedies to include the letter the SoS, State Dept as well as Head of Administrative records in the State Dept. All attempts have been “rebutted” by them in which I was sent a response which included their Jargon in one form or another. The jargon included craftily directs me to jump back on the never ending merry-go-round of non-sensical answers, Public Law and INA definitions. The problem here is that my voluntary designation was rebutted, so any thoughts on what I might be able to apply next? Thank you kindly. (source)
- Review these slides
- Read this,
- review this diagram of US vs USofA,
- read these six PDFs,
- watch Richard McDonald's seminar intro
- learn to speak like a simple man
- If this site ever goes down, the archive is on the wayback machine.
What are you guys doing? The passport application is how you affirm state citizen status.
But what about people with no need to travel internationally and no need to get a port-pass or travel papers? They would affirm state-national status with letter to Dept of State, maybe posting letter in Sheriff’s office, and likely rescinding all contracts with the federal govt and it’s corporation UNITED STATES.
Yes although, the DS-11 should be sent to the Secretary of State of the State of your birth NOT the U.S. Secretary of State. This will affirm your State Citizenship status.
Greetings,
While digging in the bone pile of American history I unearthed a few valuable nuggets of truth. To wit:
Amendment 14 states that “All persons born or naturalized in ‘the’ [not these] United States AND subject to the jurisdiction thereof [“its or Federal jurisdiction, not their jurisdiction as in Amendment 13] are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”
The US Senate stated that Congress via Amendment 14 “granted” citizenship to “All persons …”
So, Amendment 14 federal citizenship is “granted” and a “grant” is a “gift.” No one is required to accept a gift nor may they be compelled to do so.
The courts have held that “Citizenship” and “residence,” are not convertible terms. Citizenship is a “status.” It is the place or “standing” an individual holds as he relates to others in the community with a different standing. Standing is one’s place in the community in the ESTIMATION of others. It is his “relative” position in social, commercial, or moral relations or repute, grade, or rank. (Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th. Edition)
One’s “standing” is only estimated by others. If their estimate is not accurate then it ought to be corrected. One’s standing in the community is a matter of individual choice. The individual determines where he or she stands as he or she relates to others in the community.
Personal jurisdiction is based on the contact one has with the forum state. Minimum contacts must have a basis in some ACT by which the NON-RESIDENT ALIEN purposefully avails himself or herself of the PRIVILEGES of conducting BUSINESS within the forum State, thus invoking the BENEFITS and PROTECTION of its laws.”
“Protection draws with it subjection, subjection protection.” Maxim of Law The protection of an individual by the government is on the CONDITION of his SUBMISSION to the laws and such submission on the other hand ENTITLES the individual of the protection of the government. (Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th. Edition.)
Why can’t an individual give up government protection in consideration for the individual no longer being required to submit to the government’s civil or municipal laws, rules, and regulations and be subject only to the common law or criminal law?
Jurisdiction is proper … where the contacts proximately result from ACTIONS by the NON-RESIDENT ALIEN himself that CREATE a SUBSTANTIAL CONNECTION with the forum State. (McGee v. International Life Insurance Co., 355 U.S. 220, 223 – 1957) and (Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of California, Solana City, 480 U.S. 102 – 1987.)
“Merely being native born within the territorial boundaries of the United States of America does not make such an individual a ‘citizen of the United States’ subject to the jurisdiction of the 14th. Amendment.” (Elk v. Wilkins, Neb. (1844), 5s.ct41, 112 U.S. 99, 28 L. Ed. 643.)
The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment limits the power of a state court to exert PERSONAL jurisdiction over a nonresident alien to the forum State.
Citizenship is a condition that results from an individual man’s or woman’s INTENTION and ACTION to become a citizen of a state. This should also apply to federal citizenship. To wit:
“An adult person cannot become a citizen of a state by simply INTENDING to, nor does anyone become such citizen by mere RESIDENCE. The residence and the intent MUST co-exist and correspond; and though, under ordinary circumstances, the former [intention] may be sufficient evidence of the latter, it is not conclusive, and the contrary may ALWAYS be shown; and when the question of citizenship turns on the intention with which a person has resided in a particular state, his own testimony, under ordinary circumstances, is entitled to great weight on the point.” (Sharon v. Hill, 26 F. 337 (1885)
“Presumptions concerning citizenship – As a general rule, it is presumed until the contrary is shown, that every person is a citizen of the country in which he or she resides. Furthermore, once GRANTED, citizenship is presumably retained unless voluntarily relinquished, and the burden rests upon one alleging a change of citizenship and allegiance to establish that fact. Consequently, a person born in the United States is presumed to continue to be a citizen until the contrary is shown, and where it appears that a person was once a citizen of a particular foreign country, even though residing in another, the presumption is that he or she remains a citizen of such foreign country, until the contrary APPEARS.” – (3C AmJur 2d, 204, Section 2677).
Citizenship, domicile, standing, and allegiance are matters of individual choice and not a matter of where a man or woman is born. At least that is my story and I am sticking to it.
No one can be compelled to accept the “privilege” of federal or State citizenship.
The term “citizen” connotes the PRIVILEGE (not a right) of the common membership of one state. The term ‘subject” connotes the burden of a common subjection to one lord and king. (Salmond Jurisprudence, (“Full Citizenship and Allegiance,” 18 Law Quarterly Review, (1902)).
No man or woman can be compelled to become a member of a body politic against his or her will to remain in the state of nature under the Law of Nature and nature’s God.
I hope the above information is of some value to you. If I have made any errors in what I have written above please correct my errors.
PEACEMAKER