Traveling versus driving – no license needed (video proof)

Note: The TWO videos are lower down the page. My comments are first, followed by the video, then points by people much smarter than me. And don’t miss the links to other pages with great content about traveling (not driving)! 

My Comments

It is worth researching if the driver’s license is only for people being paid to transport / traffic other people or goods.

Driver = Paid for commerce – truck driver
Traffic = Move goods – drug trafficking for example
Transport = Trans – port – between ports
Passenger = Paying customer
Does the gov’t have the title to thy car? Does the gov’t own thy car?

The old and common definition for the word ‘driver‘ was someone who drove a wealthy man/woman around all day. Like so many subtle deceptions, we have been taught that a man/woman operating a car is always a driver, whereas the truth may be that the man/woman is a traveler using a car.

Now it’s gets trickier because the car transforms into a ‘vehicle’ if it was possibly purchased with Federal Reserve Bank notes or if the car is being used by a ‘driver’. There’s more to learn. But the basic premise is that no entity, in the states united, can forbid someone from traveling in a car.

The word ‘traffic’ is in a ‘traffic stop‘. Traffic means to move goods, as in a drug trafficking. If someone in a costume pulls thou over and claims thou made a traffic violation, thou might want to ask him/her to prove it. They are pretending thou is engaged in commerce and unless thou refutes it, thou will be liable for the rules around trafficking. Don’t stand under / under stand their point. Don’t agree that thou is trafficking.

And thou is not moving between ports! as in trans – ports.

[Also see Good summary about traveling versus driving for state citizens.]

Jaro’s Comments

Here are details from someone named Jaro:

Driver’s license is for DRIVING, which is a COMMERCIAL activity. And the use of a car purchased with lawful money, which is NOT for profit, is NOT commercial activity, and thusly does NOT require any license.

The difference between a car bought with CREDIT from Federal Reserve (FRNs), and a car bought with REAL, lawful money (gold and silver coins), is that the car bought with FRNs is BY DEFAULT in commerce and so justly regulated by the State.
While a car bought with REAL, lawful money (gold and silver coins), is in no way in commerce, and is truly PRIVATE property protected by Public (common) Law, and so NOT subject to State regulation on public roads.

You just gotta use counter-claim in Equity in court to assert that, or otherwise avoid admitting that you’re the statutory person/defendant.

Two Videos

Here’s a video about traveling. Note the officer asks for things, but does not demand them. The officer is required to ask, but no one is obliged to provide.

Notes for 2nd Video:

“Pulled over for the third time in 8+ months and still traveling freely and this time VERIFIED the right to travel as i am WELL WITHIN THEM(my rights) to do what i’m doing. This video takes place after i have already handed him my paperwork and he has handed it back stating, “Hold tight for a minute,” and has returned to his patrol car already. As you can clearly see this isn’t some setup, i just had barely picked up my wife off of work and in fact, this officer followed me across Main Street while on Vine Street and didn’t pull me over when i pulled to the side to pick up my wife, he went on and turned down 100 West going North. We decided to go get gas first off so we turned down 100 West to goto Chevron that was down on 500 North. Low and behold he was sitting off to the side flipped around already waiting for me to continue down Vine Street, instead he flipped around behind us as soon as we passed him. No traffic violations ever happened at any point and he finally initiated the stop at the end of the street, actually in front of one my friends places. But he got what information he needed and honored his oath letting me continue to travel. He did use his emergency lights on me, but I don’t expect all cops/people/anyone to understand this as it is not the norm and we are not taught that we have an option. Travel safely my friends.” – Brian Schaff

FamGuardian Points

Here is related knowledge from FamGuardian.org:

“A state Citizen has the right to travel on the public easements (public roads) without being registered. A statutory “U.S. citizen” does not. It is a privilege for a foreigner to travel in any of the several states.  If you are a statutory U.S. citizen, you are a foreigner in a constitutional state. The state legislators can require foreigners and people involved in commerce (chauffeurs, freight haulers) to be licensed, insured, and to have their vehicles registered. When you register your car, you turn over power of attorney to the state. At that point, it becomes a motor vehicle. If it is not registered then it is not a motor vehicle and there are no motor vehicle statutes to break. There are common law rules of the road. If you don’t cause an injury to anybody then you cannot be tried.

If your car is registered, the state effectively owns your car.  The state supplies a sticker to put on your license plate every time you re-register the motor vehicle. Look closely at the sticker on your plate right now. You may be surprised to see that it says “OFFICIAL USE ONLY”.(Note: In some states, they do not use stickers on the plate) You may have seen municipal vehicles that have signs on them saying “OFFICIAL USE ONLY” on them but why does yours? You do not own your car. You may have a Certificate of Title but you probably do not have the certificate of origin. You are leasing the state’s vehicle by paying the yearly registration fee. Because you are using their equipment, they can make rules up on how it can be used. If you break a rule, such as driving without a seatbelt, you have broken the contract and an administrative procedure will make you pay the penalty. A state Citizen must be able to explain to the police officers why they are not required to have the usual paperwork that most people have. They should carry copies of affidavits and other paperwork in their car. The state Citizen should also be prepared to go to traffic court and explain it to the judge.”

George and the Invisible Contracts

George Mercier offers his view on invisible contracts, on the license, and using ‘the king’s’ highway:

“Yes, an unknown and invisible Highway Contract was actually in effect when I was driving around without a License in effect; a contract was in effect that my legal Patriot mentors had specifically and adamantly told me did not exist (since I was not using the Highways for a Commercial purpose and my Driver’s License did not exist). But the Patriot advisors were point-blank wrong, and the contract did exist, as I will explain later; and the contract was invisible.” Read more in Invisible Contracts (long book, all online, and see the license part towards the end)

Living Man vs CORPORATE ID-ENTITY

It comes down to this:

  • Living man: free to travel, in a car, without license
  • Corporate fiction: What thou thinks is thy name, is actually the name of a corporation (or trust) that they created when you were born, and you mistakenly use this as your (ID) entity–as your business name. A business needs a license to engage in commerce.

Thou was born. The corporate fiction JANE SMITH was birthed. Thou is using the corporate fiction as thy playing piece in the world of commerce and this gets thou into a world of trouble and pain.

When they pull you over and ask for thy name, the correct answer is: “My given name is Jane. My family name is Smith.” Never ever connect them, because that is the name they gave to the corporate fiction.

This is why the microprint on checks reads “Authorized Signature” because you are authorized to sign for this JANE SMITH corporation.

So the living woman can travel, if the woman states that she is living and existing as a woman and NOT AS A PERSON/CORPORATION.

Corporations need licenses to do anything.

A living man or woman has the freedom to engage in business without restraint.

As for speeding tickets

This is an excerpt from this

Sign up for our newsletter.

Related:

24 comments on “Traveling versus driving – no license needed (video proof)

  1. Could you please show any laws and/or court cases which substantiate these claims? Are there any court cases where such people have been taken to court and prevailed? This sounds like the same old SovCit (or whatever you want to call it this year) claims which have failed for decades. Did this person file suit and win? From everything I see is a SovCit or wannabee who just wears down the cops who are attempting to avoid a confrontation. At no point does the officer concede that anything the guy says is correct. I have been searching for over a decade to find the first court case where these claims are recognized as valid and prevail. Could you please provide me with any you are aware of?
    Thank you

    1. Not only are what these people saying about our right to travel freely and unencumbered from the State factual and true just simply read the Constitution., here is one of many success stories including myself. I recently had a case on a driving on suspended license dropped to a driving without a license I consider it a win for sure. https://youtu.be/vfUJLHKKzjg

  2. This, of course, is absolutely not true. No one wins based on these arguments presented. They get this lunacy from “Black’s Law” and the Articles of Confederation (which lost all legal power the day the Constitution was passed). Just flat out silly to even listen to this nonsense.

    1. Does simply go look at the definitions Under the UCC code the code that all Enforcement Officers enforce and where their definitions come from and you can clearly see that these definitions only pertain to people driving in Commerce we all got tricked including yourself into being conditioned to think that we have to have a license or permit and or permission😂😂 from the government to be able to go about our business on the roadways. Come on you really think the government is above the Constitution??? you’re sadly mistaken.

  3. The guy in the top video does not know what he is saying. Yikes.

    One can travel in a car, automobile OR personal conveyance.

    One can be a sovereign state Citizen and not be a US citizen. However there are two types of citizenship of a state, one is a Citizen of a sovereign union state like California, Nevada, etc. and the other is a citizen of a federal municipality “State” like the State of California, the State of Nevada, etc.

    This all could have been avoided by him asking for the cops BOND NUMBER, which would trigger the cop to call in a higher level law enforcement person who would understand the situation.

    Never give a full name, only “My friend’s call me ___________.”

  4. All I can say is WOW! You managed to type an entire page of utter nonsense and make no correct nor intelligent argument from beginning to end. Basically if anyone needs a laugh, come here and read. The sad thing is that a very few number of people will come here and think this is true. After all, if you read it on the internet, it has to be true. The three of you that believe all of this, PLEASE, crawl back under your rock. PLEASE do not drive. It is scary knowing you are actually in public and have no common sense. Scary stuff ??

    1. I don’t ‘drive’. I travel. Driving is an occupation that can be regulated. And can be the victim of a ‘traffic’ stop. I’m not trafficking (shipping) anything. Traffic is a commercial term.

    2. You want to know something even more funny is the fact that you have no idea literally what you’re talkin about you’re basically saying that the constitution is not real?? Oooh boy you can’t get mad ignorant people looks like you’re going to get a little learning session today. Many Supreme Courts have already acknowledged that we have the right to travel and it is a privilege to drive so get your facts straight go look up the UCC codes and look up the definition for yourself there’s a lot more than just three people that understand this to be true is the other side conditioned side that has a belief system. This is our constitutional right to be able to travel freely and unencumbered from molestation or tyranny do your due diligence.

  5. Why would corupt thieves acting as pirates under admirality law the judges MOST OF ALL WHO BENEFIT from its perpetuation rule against itself and effect the coffers? You sound intelligent come on?

  6. The one inescapable, unarguable fact is that when your argument is wrong, you don’t allow anyone else to talk, as if your constant haranguing will void their common sense and the rules and laws that we ALL have to live by (and are written down, if you can read). At least you guys are good for entertainment value. I can watch HOURS of you clowns and your insane arguments.

    1. That’s most ignorant statement I’ve ever heard. You all are basically stating that the Constitution doesn’t pertain to the government as the Constitution was strictly enforced rules placed on the government by the people to protect the people from the government. The funny part is do you clearly have no clue what you’re talking about just like the rest of these conditions ignorant folks because you say something about law? Lol sir they push codes and statutes that is not law so get your s*** straight the only law that’s pushed as by the people constitutional law these codes and statutes that police officers enforce are not law you guys are too funny go do your due diligence do some research try reading the Constitution for once in your life might do you better than you ever thought.

  7. The licensing scheme setup under the color of law is Ab Initio. The, all capital letters name, of a PERSON and The federal government(s) and other known aliases are “doing business as” the Lawful United States Government in Corporate Meritime structure and jurisdiction. They are a fraud and so are any contracts we’ve ever signed without full and knowing disclosure of the rights surfeit and forefeited by said contact.

      1. The truth is right in front of us! People mistakenly think they are driving (meaning for hire and engaged in commerce). They mistakenly think they need to register their car. They mistakenly think they have passengers (customers). They don’t know the meaning of motor vehicle, which likely means car for hire.

  8. I now travel in Nevada; using Nevada Revised Statutes I sent letters to DMV, DPS, NHP, Carson City Sheriff, Reno PD, Sparks PD, and Washoe County Sheriff asking them if they found any problems with my reasons for surrendering my Registration and my Driver License. (when they sent me mail and asked why I was surrendering my DL I told them, in writing, “Not in commerce”. I also submitted a contract with a FEE Schedule for any LEO that interrupts my travel for any NON COMMERCIAL purpose. I also got a UCC financing Statement number from SOS with the natural woman being the Secured Party and the all caps name is my trade name. I have been followed twice and checked out 4 times and have not been stopped one time. /;-D No doubt there will be one cop out there who is going to show me who’s boss. Hahahaha!

    1. Hey there 👋 id love to get some more detailed info on how/what steps i can follow in my search for the same thing you’ve described about your ‘drivers’ license/registration. I just got pulled over with an expired drivers license/registration (ticketed for the registration), even though i said i was traveling and i know i dont need a license/registration for non-commercial traveling.
      Can u help me figure out how to navigate myself towards your peaceful travelings?
      Thank you 🙏
      Genie

      1. If thou gave the title to the DMV, they may own the car, and can then mandate how thou uses it. Maybe get back the title. Thou may have to renounce the license. Also, ask what would happen to thee if thou did not sign whatever they give thee. If they say they will arrest ‘you’, then sign with “under duress”. I’d like to add that one may be able to engage in trade on the land while using a car; ‘commercial’ uses the root ‘mer’, which means sea, and implies it’s on the water, where they have more control. Must rebut this and say on the land. Also check Santos Bonacci – https://youtu.be/r_bYg2h6YNY?t=32. And living in the private: https://livingintheprivate.blogspot.com/p/driving-is-commerce.html

    2. I’m curious as to your statement about having a contract with a fee. Doesn’t having a contract with any government agency bind you to the government and all its laws, codes, privilege’s etc? I thought the point of freedom is the unalienable right protected by our creator and not the government.

  9. I have sent DMV NOTICE OF NONE COMMERCIAL TRAVELER and that I am not a driver and I told them to cancel all contracts and recend my signature for non verification. I informed them if they fail to respond and comply with my request they will full commercial liability and default judgment for 150,000. I am getting ready to have them send me exempt license plates by court order. Does my request make any sense?

Leave a Reply to Lee-Anne Griffin Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

[crypto-donation-box]